Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
33/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Oxford Nanopore MinION long-read RNA-seq of Mus musculus produces 1.3 billion bases across 1.7 million reads at low base accuracy (23.5% Q20, 1.6% Q30). Despite accuracy limitations, long reads (mean ~775 bp) enable full-length cDNA sequencing for isoform-level resolution unavailable from standard short-read RNA-seq.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0