Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Metagenomic short-read WGS via HiSeq 2000 with 1.49 billion bases from a 53.1% GC community—suitable for taxonomic profiling, functional gene discovery, and community assembly. High quality (98% Q20, 92.4% Q30) supports robust OTU clustering and low-abundance species detection. Appropriate for microbiome and environmental genomics.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0