Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
55/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Human whole-genome long-read WGS via Oxford Nanopore PromethION with 71.3 billion bases across 5.7 million reads at ~23× coverage—enables structural variant discovery, gap closure, and haplotype reconstruction beyond short-read capabilities. Higher base quality (55.1% Q20, 22.3% Q30) than typical nanopore runs facilitates consensus accuracy. Suitable for population stratification and large indel detection.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0