Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
33/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Mus musculus bulk RNA-seq via Oxford Nanopore MinION long-read sequencing with 375 million bases across 364K reads—capable of full-length transcript capture and isoform identification beyond short-read limits, despite poor base quality (2.1% Q20, 0% Q30). Useful for novel splice junction discovery and long non-coding RNA characterization. Best used complementarily with high-quality short-read RNA-seq.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0