Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
48/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Mus musculus amplicon sequencing via 454 GS FLX Titanium yielding 8.6 million bases across 27.8K reads—older pyrosequencing platform with lower per-read quality (91.3% Q20, 74.4% Q30) and susceptibility to homopolymer run errors. Limited read count and 52.7% GC restrict assembly complexity. Not recommended for new projects; suitable only for targeted historical data integration.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0