Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
97/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Metagenomic short-read WGS via Illumina HiSeq 4000 with 819 million bases from a 54.9% GC community—higher-throughput sequencing than HiSeq 2000 with excellent quality (97.9% Q20, 94% Q30). Suitable for deep taxonomic profiling, rare species detection, and functional annotation in complex microbiomes. Appropriate for soil, water, and host-associated microbiome studies.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0