ERX3728546

ENA first seen 2021

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

100/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

High-coverage oyster WGS achieving perfect QC (100/100), driven by exceptionally low duplication (7.02%) and minimal adapters (0.14%), both favorable for de novo assembly. Strong Q30 (91%) and moderate GC (34.1%) support robust genomic analysis without reservation.

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Magallana gigas

Instrument

HiSeq X Ten

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 6870676800 reported

total reads 22902256 reported

n content pct 0.003 measured

pct q20 bases 95.9 measured

pct q30 bases 91 measured

gc content pct 34.1 measured

mean read length 150 measured

mean base quality 37.9 measured

adapter content pct 0.14 measured

duplication rate pct 7.02 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 100/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 91 measured ×1 100%

duplication rate pct 7.02 measured ×0.5 100%

adapter content pct 0.14 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 14 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0