Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
79/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Long-read WGS from PacBio Sequel with critically failed quality encoding. Complete absence of Q30 bases and zero mean quality (both measured) indicate data corruption or failed quality assessment; mean read length is excellent (8089bp) but quality failures render this dataset unsuitable for reuse without investigation and remediation.
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0