ERX3990354

ENA first seen 2021

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

55/100 · F

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Oxford Nanopore PromethION WGS of Homo sapiens achieves 71.0 billion bases (22.9× coverage) at 27.8% Q20 with mean read length ~9.1 kb. Long-read strength compensates for moderate base accuracy; particularly valuable for structural variant and repetitive-region characterization.

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Homo sapiens

Instrument

PromethION

Platform

OXFORD_NANOPORE

Read type

long-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 71024706541 reported

total reads 7831128 reported

mean coverage 22.9 extrapolated

n content pct 0 measured

pct q20 bases 27.8 measured

pct q30 bases 14.7 measured

gc content pct 38.9 measured

mean read length 2941.9 measured

mean base quality 15 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 0.65 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 55/100

The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

mean coverage 22.9 extrapolated ×1.2 68%

pct q30 bases 14.7 measured ×1 0%

duplication rate pct 0.65 measured ×0.5 100%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 27 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0