ERX3990359

ENA first seen 2021

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

40/100 · F

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Oxford Nanopore PromethION WGS of Homo sapiens achieves 43.3 billion bases (14× coverage) at 57.2% Q20, with mean read length ~8.3 kb. Lower base accuracy typical of nanopore compensated by long reads enabling structural variant discovery and complex-region assembly across human genome.

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Homo sapiens

Instrument

PromethION

Platform

OXFORD_NANOPORE

Read type

long-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 43264205035 reported

total reads 5204698 reported

mean coverage 14 extrapolated

n content pct 0 measured

pct q20 bases 57.2 measured

pct q30 bases 40.3 measured

gc content pct 40.5 measured

mean read length 10147.4 measured

mean base quality 29.3 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 0.02 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 40/100

The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

mean coverage 14 extrapolated ×1.2 27%

pct q30 bases 40.3 measured ×1 0%

duplication rate pct 0.02 measured ×0.5 100%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 20 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0