Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
55/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Human whole-genome long-read WGS via Oxford Nanopore PromethION with 70.5 billion bases across 3.6 million reads at ~23× coverage—capable of resolving structural variants, repetitive regions, and complex rearrangements beyond short-read limits. Lower base quality (30.9% Q20, 17.1% Q30) is typical of nanopore sequencing but sufficient for SV discovery and haplotype phasing. Strong for telomere-to-telomere genomics and population variation studies.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0