ERX3990366

ENA first seen 2021

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

61/100 · D

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Oxford Nanopore PromethION WGS of Homo sapiens yields 80.5 billion bases (26× coverage) at 27.6% Q20 with mean read length ~10 kb. Long reads offset moderate base accuracy; strong utility for structural variant and complex-repeat analysis across human genome.

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Homo sapiens

Instrument

PromethION

Platform

OXFORD_NANOPORE

Read type

long-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 80510919536 reported

total reads 8012575 reported

mean coverage 26 extrapolated

n content pct 0 measured

pct q20 bases 27.6 measured

pct q30 bases 15.1 measured

gc content pct 39 measured

mean read length 5119.9 measured

mean base quality 15 measured

adapter content pct 0.01 measured

duplication rate pct 0.27 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 61/100

The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

mean coverage 26 extrapolated ×1.2 82%

pct q30 bases 15.1 measured ×1 0%

duplication rate pct 0.27 measured ×0.5 100%

adapter content pct 0.01 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 19 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0