Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
83/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Human WGS with severe quality constraints on reusability. Extreme duplication (89.64%) – likely from PCR over-amplification – severely compromises variant calling and depth-based analysis; while base quality is acceptable (Q30=89.3%), the evidence strength is provisional (0.61), with coverage extrapolated rather than measured. Deep measured QC validation is needed before reuse.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0