Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
44/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Enterococcus faecalis long-read WGS via Oxford Nanopore GridION generating 784 million bases from 45.7K reads with 37.8% GC—capable of complete circular genome assembly and resolving mobile genetic elements despite low nanopore read quality (Q20: 33.4%, Q30: 1.7%). Suitable for antibiotic resistance gene mapping, plasmid characterization, and complete genome reconstruction in this nosocomial pathogen.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0