Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
47/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Oxford Nanopore MinION WGS of Escherichia coli K-12 reference strain yields 247 million bases across 39.8k reads at very low base accuracy (2.5% Q20, 0.6% Q30). Raw reads require consensus correction; utility lies in long-read assembly (mean ~6.2 kb) for structural validation and gap-filling.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0