Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
87/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Rattus norvegicus bulk RNA-seq via HiSeq 2000 with 1.97 billion bases and 50.6 million reads—adequate for gene expression profiling and tissue-specific isoform detection. Moderate base quality (93.9% Q20, 87.3% Q30) with balanced 50.5% GC suggests good library representation. Appropriate for rat disease models and comparative mammalian transcriptomics.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0