ERX637127

ENA first seen 2014

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

33/100 · F

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Illumina MiSeq amplicon data from food metagenome with minimal 2.7 million bases, 5.4k reads at 40.5% Q20. Extremely limited scope; suitable only as preliminary quality assessment, not for robust microbial profiling.

Data type / assay

amplicon

Organism

food metagenome

Instrument

Illumina MiSeq

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 2676000 reported

total reads 5352 reported

n content pct 0.019 measured

pct q20 bases 40.5 measured

pct q30 bases 35.3 measured

gc content pct 55.8 measured

mean read length 250 measured

mean base quality 18.6 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 19.94 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 2 scored metric(s) → 33/100

The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 35.3 measured ×1 0%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.5 100%

QC cost 1 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0