Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Oak (Quercus robur) short-read WGS via HiSeq 2000 with 34.7 billion bases, 97.9% Q20, and 35.6% GC—comparable quality to related Quercus samples, enabling comparative plant genomics. High Q20 and zero N-content support robust SNP calling and assembly. Suitable for population structure analysis, adaptive genomics, and tree species phylogenetics.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0