Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
99/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Oak (Quercus robur) short-read WGS via HiSeq 2000 with 42.9 billion bases and 95.5% Q20—substantial depth for population-level genomic studies, SNP discovery, and genomic association mapping in this tree species. Moderate Q30 (92.3%) suggests potential for minor systematic bias; screening recommended. Suitable for forest genetics and ecological genomics.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0