Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
47/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Escherichia coli str. K-12 MinION long-read WGS with only 30 million bases across 2,855 reads—extremely shallow coverage and poor base quality (4.9% Q20, 0.9% Q30). Insufficient for genome assembly, variant calling, or structural analysis. Represents a technical test or failed sequencing run; not suitable for biological interpretation.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0