FC030576

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 692 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained

No quantitative QC rubric exists for this data type yet, so it is deliberately left unscored — this is an honest "not applicable", not a poor rating.

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0 · provisional — verify independently

Scientific quality

Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.

• Firefly genomes illuminate parallel origins of bioluminescen... L1 93/100
• Topological signatures in regulatory network enable phenotyp... L1 94/100
• Generic injuries are sufficient to induce ectopic Wnt organi... L1 100/100
• Competitive binding of STATs to receptor phospho-Tyr motifs... L1 89/100
• Co-regulation and function of <i>FOXM1</i>/<i>RHNO1</i> bidi... L1 76/100
• Tbx5 drives <i>Aldh1a2</i> expression to regulate a RA-Hedge... L1 84/100
• Disrupted PGR-B and ESR1 signaling underlies defective decid... L1 78/100