← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 57 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
57 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
metadata only · no data-level QC for this typeStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained
Data type / assay
GWAS-summary
Organism
Homo sapiens
Instrument
Affymetrix
N numbers (samples, groups)
8,192 individuals
No quantitative QC rubric exists for this data type yet, so it is deliberately left unscored — this is an honest "not applicable", not a poor rating.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · enum-gwas-1.0 · provisional — verify independently