Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 201 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
80 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained
No quantitative QC rubric exists for this data type yet, so it is deliberately left unscored — this is an honest "not applicable", not a poor rating.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0 · provisional — verify independently
Scientific quality
Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.
- PulmonDB: a curated lung disease gene expression database.⚑ L1 53/100 ⚑
- Identification of a novel 10 immune-related genes signature...
- Predicting Bone Metastasis Using Gene Expression-Based Machi... L1 62/100
- Comprehensive analysis of a novel RNA modifications-related... L1 71/100
- Identification of the shared hub gene signatures and molecul... L1 71/100