Corpus 1,273 assessed · 1,174 scored · 643 reproduced ≥75 · 169 flagged ·∅ 74.1/100
← Dataset search

GSE102556

GEO first seen 2023

Sex-specific Transcriptional Signatures in Human Depression

Organism
Homo sapiens; Mus musculus
Samples
341
Type
Expression profiling by high...
Submitted
2017-08-11

Rational: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a leading cause of disease burden worldwide. While the incidence, symptoms and treatment of MDD all point toward major sex differences, the molecular mechanisms underlying this sexual dimorphism remain largely unknown. Methods: Here, combining differential expression and gene coexpression network analyses, we provide a comprehensive characterization of male and female transcriptional profiles associated with MDD across 6 brain regions. We overlap our...

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 16 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Deposited / produced by
Benoit LabonteOlivia EngmannImmanuel PurushothamanCaroline MénardJunshi WangChunfeng TanJoseph R ScarpaGregory MoyYong-Hwee E LohMichael CahillZachary S LorschPeter J HamiltonErin S CalipariGeorgia E HodesOrna IsslerHope KronmanMadeline PfauAleksandar ObradovicYan DongRachael L NeveScott RussoAndrew KazarskisCarol TammingaNaguib MechawarGustavo TureckiBin ZhangLi ShenEric J Nestler
Reused by

15 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

metadata only · no data-level QC for this type

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained

No quantitative QC rubric exists for this data type yet, so it is deliberately left unscored — this is an honest "not applicable", not a poor rating.

QC cost 4 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0 · provisional — verify independently

Scientific quality

Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.

1 studies use it mean score 64