Corpus 1,272 assessed · 1,173 scored · 643 reproduced ≥75 · 168 flagged ·∅ 74.1/100
← Dataset search

GSE102746

GEO

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

100/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means
claude:haiku

Human bulk-RNA-seq achieving perfect-score quality metrics with exceptional base quality (Q30 96.6%, mean 38.5) and minimal duplication (20.94%), highly suitable for reuse; provisional due to HTTP 429 access error but measured metrics are excellent.

Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Homo sapiens
Metrics (value · how obtained)
n content pct 0.015 measured
pct q20 bases 98.3 measured
pct q30 bases 96.6 measured
gc content pct 45.5 measured
mean read length 51 measured
mean base quality 38.5 measured
adapter content pct 0.09 measured
duplication rate pct 20.94 measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 100/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 96.6 measured ×1 100%
mean base quality 38.5 measured ×0.6 100%
adapter content pct 0.09 measured ×0.4 100%
duplication rate pct 20.94 measured ×0.4 100%
QC cost 23 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0

Scientific quality

Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.

1 studies use it mean score 65