Corpus 1,272 assessed · 1,173 scored · 643 reproduced ≥75 · 168 flagged ·∅ 74.1/100
← Dataset search

GSE104840

GEO first seen 2021

LSD1-mediated enhancer silencing enables endocrine cell development through attenuation of retinoic acid signaling

Organism
Homo sapiens
Samples
63
Type
Expression profiling by high...
Submitted
2017-10-11

Developmental progression depends on temporally defined changes in gene expression mediated by transient exposure of lineage intermediates to signals in the progenitor niche. To identify a possible contribution of cell-intrinsic epigenetic mechanisms to signal-induced transcriptional responses, we manipulated the signaling environment and activity of the histone demethylase LSD1 during stepwise differentiation of gut tube intermediates into pancreatic endocrine cells. Analysis of enhancer and tr...

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 2 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Deposited / produced by
Vinckier NicholasMaike Sander
Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

insufficient data to score

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained

Data type / assay
ChIP-seq
Organism
Homo sapiens
Metrics (value · how obtained)
n content pct 0.019 measured
pct q20 bases 98.6 measured
pct q30 bases 95.9 measured
gc content pct 40.6 measured
mean read length 50 measured
mean base quality 39.1 measured
adapter content pct 0.01 measured
duplication rate pct 5.34 measured
How this grade was computed

The insufficient grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published ChIP-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 95.9 measured ×1 100%
QC cost 18 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0

Scientific quality

Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.

1 studies use it 1 reproduced mean score 84