Corpus 1,272 assessed · 1,173 scored · 643 reproduced ≥75 · 168 flagged ·∅ 74.1/100
← Dataset search

GSE107726

GEO first seen 2018

ChIP-seq analysis of H3K27ac, GATA1 and TAL1 in MYO1D hub vs non-hub enhancer knockout K562 cells

Organism
Homo sapiens
Samples
24
Type
Genome binding/occupancy pro...
Submitted
2017-12-05

Recent studies have highlighted super-enhancers (SEs) as important regulatory elements for gene expression, but their intrinsic properties remain incompletely characterized. Through an integrative analysis of Hi-C and ChIP-seq data, we find that a significant fraction of SEs are hierarchically organized, containing both hub and non-hub enhancers. Hub enhancers share similar histone marks with non-hub enhancers, but are distinctly associated with cohesin and CTCF binding sites and disease-associa...

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Deposited / produced by
Kailong LiYuannyu ZhangJian Xu

Deep data QC

insufficient data to score

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained

Data type / assay
ChIP-seq
Organism
Homo sapiens
Metrics (value · how obtained)
n content pct 0.001 measured
pct q20 bases 94.7 measured
pct q30 bases 92.8 measured
gc content pct 49.8 measured
mean read length 74.5 measured
mean base quality 34.1 measured
adapter content pct 0 measured
duplication rate pct 1.84 measured
How this grade was computed

The insufficient grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published ChIP-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 92.8 measured ×1 100%
QC cost 24 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0