Prediction of survival in diffuse large B cell lymphoma treated with chemotherapy plus Rituximab
Gene expression profiling of DLBCL patient samples was performed to investigate, whether molecular gene expression signatures retain their prognostic significance in patients treated with chemotherapy plus Rituximab. The lymphnode, germinal center signature and a new angiogenesis signature were combined to a final multivariate model which defined quartile groups among Rituximab-CHOP-treated patients with distinct 3-year overall survival rates.
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 92 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
- Clinical and Biological Subtypes of B-cell Lymphoma Revealed by... 2021 · 250 cites
- Discovery and validation of immune-associated long non-coding RN... 2017 · 213 cites
- Bcl-2, Bcl-xL, and Bcl-w are not equivalent targets of ABT-737 a... 2012 · 191 cites
- B-Cell-Specific Diversion of Glucose Carbon Utilization Reveals... 2018 · 134 cites
- The Long Noncoding RNA MALAT-1 is A Novel Biomarker in Various C... 2016 · 112 cites
- Novel HDAC inhibitor Chidamide synergizes with Rituximab to inhi... 2020 · 102 cites
- Weighted Frequent Gene Co-expression Network Mining to Identify... 2012 · 86 cites
- A Microarray Platform-Independent Classification Tool for Cell o... 2013 · 77 cites
- Identification of a novel BET bromodomain inhibitor‐sensitive, g... 2013 · 77 cites
71 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
metadata only · no data-level QC for this typeStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained
No quantitative QC rubric exists for this data type yet, so it is deliberately left unscored — this is an honest "not applicable", not a poor rating.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0 · provisional — verify independently
Scientific quality
Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.