A Comparative Assessment of iPSC Derived Cardiomyocytes with Heart Tissues in Humans and Chimpanzees
To study regulatory differences between species, the field of comparative primate genomics has used several approaches, including the use of post mortem frozen tissues, cell lines, and model organisms. However, there are limited quality cell lines from primates and post-mortem tissues cannot be staged, are not amenable to experimental perturbations and are often subject to high environmental variances. Inducible pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) are an attractive system to study primate biology in...
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 2 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
metadata only · no data-level QC for this typeStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained
No quantitative QC rubric exists for this data type yet, so it is deliberately left unscored — this is an honest "not applicable", not a poor rating.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0 · provisional — verify independently