Corpus 1,272 assessed · 1,173 scored · 643 reproduced ≥75 · 168 flagged ·∅ 74.1/100
← Dataset search

GSE111113

GEO first seen 2019

Single-Cell Transcriptomes Distinguish Stem Cell State Changes and Lineage Specification Programs in Early Mammary Gland Development

Organism
Mus musculus
Samples
4
Type
Expression profiling by high...
Submitted
2018-02-26

Single cell analysis of the mouse mammary gland from embryonic to adult stages using 10X Chromium platform.

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 2 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Deposited / produced by
Rajshekhar R GiraddiChi-Yeh ChungRichard E HeinzOzlen BalciogluMark NovotnyChristy L TrejoChristopher DravisBerhane HagosElnaz M MehrabadLuo W RodewaldJae HwangCheng FanRoger LaskenKatherine T VarleyCharles M PerouGeoffrey M WahlBenjamin T Spike
Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

100/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means
claude:haiku

Mouse bulk RNA-seq. Grade A. Exceptional measured quality across all metrics: Q30 97.7%, base quality 39, and exceptionally low duplication (9.28%); these metrics ensure reliable base calls and unbiased abundance estimates. Excellent for reuse in expression and variant studies.

Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Mus musculus
Metrics (value · how obtained)
n content pct 0.031 measured
pct q20 bases 99.3 measured
pct q30 bases 97.7 measured
gc content pct 50.6 measured
mean read length 26 measured
mean base quality 39 measured
adapter content pct 0 measured
duplication rate pct 9.28 measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 100/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 97.7 measured ×1 100%
mean base quality 39 measured ×0.6 100%
adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%
duplication rate pct 9.28 measured ×0.4 100%
QC cost 10 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0

Scientific quality

Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.

1 studies use it 1 reproduced mean score 96