Corpus 1,272 assessed · 1,173 scored · 643 reproduced ≥75 · 168 flagged ·∅ 74.1/100
← Dataset search

GSE115098

GEO first seen 2018

Kidney compartment specific eQTL studies highlight causal genes and pathways for renal disease development

Organism
Homo sapiens
Samples
20
Type
Expression profiling by high...
Submitted
2018-05-30

Expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) analyses were conducted separately on the glomerular and tubular portions of healthy human kidney samples obtained from subjects of European descent.

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 4 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

Deep data QC

100/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means
claude:haiku

Excellent human bulk RNA-seq with strong base quality (89.8% Q30) and remarkably low duplication (1.95%), indicating high capture complexity. Exceptional for sensitive expression and differential abundance analyses where duplicate-driven bias is problematic.

Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Homo sapiens
Files available
TXT
Metrics (value · how obtained)
n content pct 0 measured
pct q20 bases 97.5 measured
pct q30 bases 89.8 measured
gc content pct 48.8 measured
mean read length 96.6 measured
mean base quality 35.5 measured
adapter content pct 0 measured
duplication rate pct 1.95 measured
supplementary file types TXT reported
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 100/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 89.8 measured ×1 99%
mean base quality 35.5 measured ×0.6 100%
adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%
duplication rate pct 1.95 measured ×0.4 100%

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0

Scientific quality

Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.

1 studies use it 1 reproduced mean score 95