Corpus 1,273 assessed · 1,174 scored · 643 reproduced ≥75 · 169 flagged ·∅ 74.1/100
← Dataset search

GSE121141

GEO first seen 2018

A whole lifespan mouse multi-tissue DNA methylation clock

Organism
Mus musculus
Samples
81
Type
Methylation profiling by hig...
Submitted
2018-10-11

Age predictors based on DNA methylation levels at a small set of CpG sites, DNAm clocks, have been developed for humans and extended to several other species. Three currently available versions of mouse DNAm clocks were either created for individual tissues or tuned towards young ages. Here, we constructed a robust multi-tissue age predictor based on 435 CpG sites, which covers the entire mouse lifespan and remains unbiased with respect to any particular age group. It can successfully detect the...

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 4 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Deposited / produced by
Margarita V MeerVadim N Gladyshev
Reused by

3 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

insufficient data to score

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained

Data type / assay
methylation
Organism
Mus musculus
Files available
COV
Metrics (value · how obtained)
n content pct 0.01 measured
pct q20 bases 97.1 measured
pct q30 bases 94.4 measured
gc content pct 34.1 measured
mean read length 150 measured
mean base quality 39 measured
adapter content pct 46.4 measured
duplication rate pct 61.08 measured
supplementary file types COV reported
How this grade was computed

The insufficient grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published methylation thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 94.4 measured ×1 100%

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0

Scientific quality

Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.

1 studies use it 1 reproduced mean score 93