Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Deep data QC
97/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Mouse transcriptome data generated via bulk RNA-seq with 150 bp reads and strong base quality (93.3% Q30, 97.4% Q20) support transcript abundance estimation and gene expression comparisons. Moderate adapter content (5.7%) is present but not prohibitive; standard trimming workflows can remediate this prior to alignment. The dataset is suitable for reuse in differential expression and pathway analysis studies.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0