Corpus 1,273 assessed · 1,174 scored · 643 reproduced ≥75 · 169 flagged ·∅ 74.1/100
← Dataset search

GSE130655

GEO

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

30/100 · F

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Mus musculus
Files available
BW
Metrics (value · how obtained)
n content pct 0.002 measured
pct q20 bases 68.8 measured
pct q30 bases 60.2 measured
gc content pct 52.7 measured
mean read length 62 measured
mean base quality 25.8 measured
adapter content pct 0.05 measured
duplication rate pct 39.81 measured
supplementary file types BW reported
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 30/100

The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 60.2 measured ×1 0%
mean base quality 25.8 measured ×0.6 0%
adapter content pct 0.05 measured ×0.4 100%
duplication rate pct 39.81 measured ×0.4 78%

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0

Scientific quality

Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.

1 studies use it 1 reproduced mean score 100