Corpus 1,272 assessed · 1,173 scored · 643 reproduced ≥75 · 168 flagged ·∅ 74.1/100
← Dataset search

GSE131776

GEO first seen 2020

Single cell analysis of smooth muscle cell phenotypic modulation in vivo during disease in mice and humans [mouse scRNA-seq]

Organism
Mus musculus
Samples
18
Type
Expression profiling by high...
Submitted
2019-05-25

In response to various stimuli, vascular smooth muscle cells (SMCs) can de-differentiate, proliferate and migrate in a process known as phenotypic modulation. However, the phenotype of modulated SMCs in vivo during atherosclerosis and the influence of this process on coronary artery disease (CAD) risk have not been clearly established. Using single cell RNA sequencing, we comprehensively characterized the transcriptomic phenotype of modulated SMCs in vivo in atherosclerotic lesions of both mouse...

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 5 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Deposited / produced by
Robert C WirkaDhananjay WaghDavid T PaikMilos PjanicTrieu NguyenClint L MillerRamen KunduManabu NagaoJohn CollerTiffany KoyanoRobyn FongY J WooBoxiang LiuStephen B MontgomeryJoseph C WuKuixi ZhuRui ChangMelissa AlampreseMichelle D TallquistJuyong B KimThomas Quertermous
Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

metadata only · no data-level QC for this type

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained

Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Mus musculus
Files available
TXT
Metrics (value · how obtained)
supplementary file types TXT reported
QC cost 6 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0 · provisional — verify independently

Scientific quality

Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.

1 studies use it mean score 68