Corpus 1,272 assessed · 1,173 scored · 643 reproduced ≥75 · 168 flagged ·∅ 74.1/100
← Dataset search

GSE139448

GEO

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 8 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

8 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

100/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means
claude:haiku

Human expression profiling with 26 bp reads and outstanding 98.7% Q20, 97% Q30 metrics across 2.5 billion bases indicates high-fidelity small-RNA or microRNA sequencing. The 50.3% GC and mean quality 36.5 with zero adapter contamination support comprehensive discovery of regulatory miRNAs; users should apply miRNA-specific quantification tools to maximize biological signal.

Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Homo sapiens
Metrics (value · how obtained)
n content pct 0.004 measured
pct q20 bases 98.7 measured
pct q30 bases 97 measured
gc content pct 50.3 measured
mean read length 26 measured
mean base quality 36.5 measured
adapter content pct 0 measured
duplication rate pct 1.84 measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 100/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 97 measured ×1 100%
mean base quality 36.5 measured ×0.6 100%
adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%
duplication rate pct 1.84 measured ×0.4 100%
QC cost 8 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0

Scientific quality

Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.

1 studies use it mean score 66