← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
What this means
claude:haiku This human RNA-Seq with unavailable metadata shows high quality (91.6% Q30) and mean read length of 50 bp. Metadata gaps prevent platform identification.
Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Homo sapiens
Metrics (value · how obtained)
n content pct
0.257
measured
pct q20 bases
98.1
measured
pct q30 bases
91.6
measured
gc content pct
48.3
measured
mean read length
50
measured
mean base quality
35.2
measured
adapter content pct
0
measured
duplication rate pct
19.82
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 100/100
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
91.6
measured
×1
100%
mean base quality
35.2
measured
×0.6
100%
adapter content pct
0
measured
×0.4
100%
duplication rate pct
19.82
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
25 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0