GSE142068
GEOProvenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
98/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Bulk RNA-seq from mouse using NextSeq 500. Grade A (98/100) with Q30 at 90.4% and minimal adapter content (0.37%). Mean base quality of 33.6 (scored 93/100) and duplication of 32.06% (scored 95/100) are the only minor softness in an otherwise robust dataset; highly recommended for reuse.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0