Corpus 1,272 assessed · 1,173 scored · 643 reproduced ≥75 · 168 flagged ·∅ 74.1/100
← Dataset search

GSE143985

GEO first seen 2021

Clinical significance of gene signature generated from the grade of tumor budding in colorectal cancer

Organism
Homo sapiens
Samples
91
Type
Expression profiling by arra...
Submitted
2020-01-21

Tumor budding is a definite prognostic marker, but does not always show favorable reproducibility. We developed a new molecular signature related to tumor budding levels, a microscopic finding of dedifferentiation, using RNA extracted from the whole tissue section and disclosed its relevance to a high recurrence risk using an inhouse dataset and independent public datasets.

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 14 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Deposited / produced by
Eiji ShintoYuichiro YoshidaYoshiki KajiwaraKoichi OkamotoSatsuki MochizukiMasato YamaderaTakehiro ShiraishiKen NagataHitoshi TsudaKazuo HaseHideki Ueno
Reused by

12 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

metadata only · no data-level QC for this type

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained

No quantitative QC rubric exists for this data type yet, so it is deliberately left unscored — this is an honest "not applicable", not a poor rating.

QC cost 4 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0 · provisional — verify independently

Scientific quality

Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.

1 studies use it mean score 61