GSE144957
GEOProvenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
No linked papers found in the corpus yet.
Deep data QC
78/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Mouse bulk-RNA-seq with 151 bp reads at 92.3% Q20 and 88.1% Q30 shows moderate quality typical of aging Illumina instruments. The 41.5% GC and 33.3 mean quality indicate accumulated errors; users should apply conservative mapping thresholds; sufficient for gene-level quantification but not for single-base variant or isoform-level studies.
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0
Scientific quality
Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.