Corpus 1,272 assessed · 1,173 scored · 643 reproduced ≥75 · 168 flagged ·∅ 74.1/100
← Dataset search

GSE146771

GEO first seen 2021

Single-Cell Analyses Inform Mechanisms of Myeloid-Targeted therapies in colon cancer

Organism
Homo sapiens
Samples
20
Type
Expression profiling by high...
Submitted
2020-03-11

Single cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) is a powerful tool for defining cellular diversity in tumors, but its application towards dissecting mechanisms underlying immune-modulating therapies is scarce. We performed scRNA-seq analyses on immune and stromal populations from colorectal cancer patients, identifying specific macrophage and conventional dendritic cell (cDC) subsets as key mediators of cellular cross-talk in the tumor microenvironment. Defining comparable myeloid populations in mouse tu...

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 29 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Deposited / produced by
Lei ZhangZiyi LiKatarzyna M SkrzypczynskaQiao FangWei ZhangSarah A O’BrienYao HeLynn WangQiming ZhangAeryon KimRanran GaoJessica OrfTao WangDeepali SawantJiajinlong KangDev BhattDaniel LuChi-Ming LiAaron RapaportKristy PerezYingjiang YeShan WangXueda HuXianwen RenWenjun OuyangZhanlong ShenJackson G EgenZemin ZhangXin Yu
Reused by

27 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

metadata only · no data-level QC for this type

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained

No quantitative QC rubric exists for this data type yet, so it is deliberately left unscored — this is an honest "not applicable", not a poor rating.

QC cost 3 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0 · provisional — verify independently

Scientific quality

Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.

1 studies use it mean score 66