Corpus 1,272 assessed · 1,173 scored · 643 reproduced ≥75 · 168 flagged ·∅ 74.1/100
← Dataset search

GSE146897

GEO first seen 2023

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

Deep data QC

insufficient data to score

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained

Data type / assay
ATAC-seq
Organism
Mus musculus
Metrics (value · how obtained)
n content pct 0.013 measured
pct q20 bases 98.1 measured
pct q30 bases 94.9 measured
gc content pct 50.8 measured
mean read length 100 measured
mean base quality 39 measured
adapter content pct 37.96 measured
duplication rate pct 21.31 measured
How this grade was computed

The insufficient grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published ATAC-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 94.9 measured ×1 100%
QC cost 24 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0