GSE147863
GEOProvenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
No linked papers found in the corpus yet.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This is a bulk human RNA-seq dataset that earns a clean A: every metric feeding the score was directly measured (evidence_strength=1), so the grade rests on real QC output rather than extrapolation. The two strongest drivers are the base-call quality and library complexity — 98.9% of bases at Q30 (mean quality 35) means base errors are vanishingly rare and won't seed spurious variants or quantification noise, while a 1.54% duplication rate plus 0% adapter contamination indicate a complex, well-prepped library with little PCR or trimming artifact. For reuse the main caveat is not a quality failure but read geometry: a 28 bp mean read length is short for RNA-seq and will limit multi-mapping resolution, splice-junction detection, and isoform-level work, so this is most trustworthy for gene-level expression rather than transcript- or fusion-level analyses. Note also a 429 fetch error blocked some upstream metadata retrieval, but it did not affect the measured QC metrics, so the rating itself is firmly grounded.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0
Scientific quality
Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.