Corpus 1,272 assessed · 1,173 scored · 643 reproduced ≥75 · 168 flagged ·∅ 74.1/100
← Dataset search

GSE147863

GEO

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

No linked papers found in the corpus yet.

Deep data QC

100/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means
claude:opus

This is a bulk human RNA-seq dataset that earns a clean A: every metric feeding the score was directly measured (evidence_strength=1), so the grade rests on real QC output rather than extrapolation. The two strongest drivers are the base-call quality and library complexity — 98.9% of bases at Q30 (mean quality 35) means base errors are vanishingly rare and won't seed spurious variants or quantification noise, while a 1.54% duplication rate plus 0% adapter contamination indicate a complex, well-prepped library with little PCR or trimming artifact. For reuse the main caveat is not a quality failure but read geometry: a 28 bp mean read length is short for RNA-seq and will limit multi-mapping resolution, splice-junction detection, and isoform-level work, so this is most trustworthy for gene-level expression rather than transcript- or fusion-level analyses. Note also a 429 fetch error blocked some upstream metadata retrieval, but it did not affect the measured QC metrics, so the rating itself is firmly grounded.

Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Homo sapiens
Metrics (value · how obtained)
n content pct 0.002 measured
pct q20 bases 99.2 measured
pct q30 bases 98.9 measured
gc content pct 48 measured
mean read length 28 measured
mean base quality 35 measured
adapter content pct 0 measured
duplication rate pct 1.54 measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 100/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 98.9 measured ×1 100%
mean base quality 35 measured ×0.6 100%
adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%
duplication rate pct 1.54 measured ×0.4 100%
QC cost 37 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0

Scientific quality

Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.

1 studies use it 1 reproduced mean score 87