GSE148973

GEO first seen 2020

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

An Integrated Epigenomic and Transcriptomic Map of Mouse and Hum... 2020 · 79 cites

Deep data QC

97/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

This mouse RNA-Seq with unavailable details shows good quality (93% Q30) and unusually long mean read length of 151 bp with elevated adapter content (4.92%). Metadata gaps limit interpretation.

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Mus musculus

Metrics (value · how obtained)

n content pct 0.007 measured

pct q20 bases 97.2 measured

pct q30 bases 93 measured

gc content pct 49.1 measured

mean read length 151 measured

mean base quality 38.5 measured

adapter content pct 4.92 measured

duplication rate pct 17.4 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 97/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 93 measured ×1 100%

mean base quality 38.5 measured ×0.6 100%

adapter content pct 4.92 measured ×0.4 84%

duplication rate pct 17.4 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 25 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0