← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
What this means
claude:haiku This human RNA-Seq from NovaSeq 6000 totals 42 billion bases with high quality (94% Q30). The substantial depth supports comprehensive transcriptome analysis.
Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Homo sapiens
Instrument
Illumina NovaSeq 6000
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
6 / 6 runs
Completeness
100%
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
42038635500
reported
total reads
140128785
reported
n content pct
0.005
measured
pct q20 bases
97.8
measured
pct q30 bases
94
measured
gc content pct
50
measured
mean read length
150
measured
mean base quality
36
measured
adapter content pct
0.66
measured
duplication rate pct
18.43
measured
supplementary file types
TXT
reported
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 100/100
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
94
measured
×1
100%
mean base quality
36
measured
×0.6
100%
adapter content pct
0.66
measured
×0.4
100%
duplication rate pct
18.43
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
6 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0