GSE150736

GEO

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

No linked papers found in the corpus yet.

Deep data QC

85/100 · B

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Bulk RNA-seq with excellent base quality (Q30=94.5%, mean_BQ=37) but burdened by very high duplication (70.15%); the extreme duplication substantially reduces effective library complexity and statistical power despite outstanding base accuracy.

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Homo sapiens

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2500

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

109 / 109 runs

Completeness

100%

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 156797668400 reported

total reads 2193059487 reported

n content pct 0 measured

pct q20 bases 97.5 measured

pct q30 bases 94.5 measured

gc content pct 62.2 measured

mean read length 47 measured

mean base quality 37 measured

adapter content pct 0.01 measured

duplication rate pct 70.15 measured

supplementary file types BED, TXT reported

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 85/100

The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 94.5 measured ×1 100%

mean base quality 37 measured ×0.6 100%

adapter content pct 0.01 measured ×0.4 100%

duplication rate pct 70.15 measured ×0.4 11%

QC cost 19 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0