Corpus 1,273 assessed · 1,174 scored · 643 reproduced ≥75 · 169 flagged ·∅ 74.1/100
← Dataset search

GSE150929

GEO first seen 2020

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

Deep data QC

insufficient data to score

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained

Data type / assay
methylation
Organism
Zea mays
Metrics (value · how obtained)
n content pct 0.029 measured
pct q20 bases 96.3 measured
pct q30 bases 93.2 measured
gc content pct 28 measured
mean read length 126 measured
mean base quality 36.2 measured
adapter content pct 3.56 measured
duplication rate pct 2.59 measured
How this grade was computed

The insufficient grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published methylation thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 93.2 measured ×1 100%
QC cost 25 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0