GSE151570

GEO first seen 2021

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

Plasmid fitness costs are caused by specific genetic conflicts e... 2021 · 158 cites

Deep data QC

90/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

This bacterial RNA-Seq with unavailable details shows high quality (95.1% Q30) and mean read length of 147.2 bp, suggesting long-read sequencing. Metadata unavailability limits characterization.

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Pseudomonas [fluorescens] SBW25

Metrics (value · how obtained)

n content pct 0 measured

pct q20 bases 98.5 measured

pct q30 bases 95.1 measured

gc content pct 56.1 measured

mean read length 147.2 measured

mean base quality 39.2 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 57.9 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 90/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 95.1 measured ×1 100%

mean base quality 39.2 measured ×0.6 100%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

duplication rate pct 57.9 measured ×0.4 38%

QC cost 25 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0