Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
- Mapping the epigenomic and transcriptomic interplay during memor... 2020 · 171 cites
Deep data QC
91/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Mouse 40 bp short-read RNA-seq with excellent Q30 rate (95.6%) and notably elevated GC content (64.1%), consistent with sequencing of GC-rich transcripts or small RNAs with biased composition. Mean base quality of 37.1 and minimal adapter retention indicate clean library. Searchable for mouse transcript profiling with GC-skewed samples.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0