Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 22 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
- Targeting Ferroptosis as a Novel Approach to Alleviate Aortic Di... 2022 · 122 cites
21 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Human bulk-RNA-seq with 150 bp reads achieved 96.5% Q20 and 91% Q30 across 710 million bases, providing sufficient length for isoform detection. The 44.9% GC and elevated 0.92% adapter contamination suggest minor library contamination; after trimming, supports comprehensive transcript profiling and splicing analysis in human tissues.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0
Scientific quality
Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.